What Financial Planning Misunderstands About Women

Every Women’s Month, the same financial guidance is reiterated: Budget wisely, start investing early, secure insurance, and create a will. While this advice is valid, it is ultimately incomplete.

This guidance focuses on women’s financial outcomes as a matter of making better choices, overlooking that most financial plans are designed around a certain lifestyle: Consistent full-time employment, escalating income, regular retirement savings, and a predictable retirement timeline.

However, many women’s lives don’t reflect this structure. Their earnings may begin at a lower point and fluctuate frequently. A child may come into the picture. A parent might require care. The family might move, or one partner’s career could take precedence over the other’s.

Paid work may become part-time, pause, or restart at a diminished level. Though these decisions may be familial, the financial repercussions often fall disproportionately on one individual’s retirement fund.

This reveals the overlooked economic implications of career interruptions. A year off from work doesn’t just equate to losing one year’s salary; it also results in missed retirement contributions, benefits from employers, promotions, salary advancements, and lost potential growth on uninvested funds.

If a woman returns to work at a lower salary, the consequences continue. Therefore, a five-year hiatus can lead to financial repercussions that far exceed five years’ worth of savings.

Read:
Unequal futures: The financial reality of women’s retirement
Who is the financial advice industry really talking to?
Financial planning for women: Are you optimizing your annual tax benefits?

Furthermore, longevity amplifies this gap into a more significant concern. Generally, women live longer than men. Those with fewer consistent years to build wealth may find they have more years of life to sustain financially.

This represents the double-compounding challenge central to retirement planning for women. Longevity considerations should not merely involve pursuing a larger total sum.

It must take into account sustainable income, healthcare needs, housing, the potential for living alone, and assistance in financial decision-making should it become difficult. A longer life is a blessing; however, an underfunded one can lead to extended vulnerability.

Marriage might further obscure this risk. A household can be affluent while one partner remains financially at risk, lacking assets in her own name, a solid credit history, adequate retirement provisions, or a clear grasp of the household finances.

Every spouse needs a financial identity

Establishing a financial identity does not imply secrecy or an expectation of marital failure. It means comprehending the marital financial arrangement, participating in planning meetings, being aware of where investments and debts are held, having access to relevant documents, and understanding wills, beneficiaries, and insurance policies. No one’s foundational financial education should occur amid the grief of losing a spouse.

The proactive approach begins prior to a career hiatus. If a household benefits from one partner providing unpaid caregiving, it should continue to support that individual’s retirement, risk management, skills, and eventual re-entry into the workforce.

Care has financial value even in the absence of a paycheck. Consequently, life insurance should account for the expense of replacing caregiving, not merely the loss of a salary. This shifts the perspective. Instead of asking, “Can she afford to stop working?”, families should consider, “How do we ensure a shared family decision doesn’t become her individual retirement disadvantage?”

The foundational principles still hold significant weight. Investing small amounts early allows capital to start compounding before life’s expenses rise. Income protection safeguards what is often a young woman’s most valuable asset: Her potential future earnings.

An emergency fund provides essential decision-making space in times of illness, unemployment, divorce, or bereavement. Ongoing education supports her ability to re-enter the job market and rebuild her income. These elements are interconnected financial products that collectively foster resilience through life’s transitions.

Read:
SA women: Five of the biggest obstacles that stand in their way
Financial planning for women: Five ways to protect your financial future

The implications of these financial dynamics are also intergenerational. Behaviors that promote intergenerational wealth often precede formal estate transfers. Children who witness both parents engaging in discussions around investments, debts, and insurance learn that financial empowerment is not limited to one gender.

Financial planning for women should not simply be a modified version of traditional plans. Equitable products can result in unequal outcomes when individuals experience different economic trajectories. A comprehensive financial plan asks more than, “What have you accumulated?”; it also queries, “Whose life was our analysis based on?”

True financial well-being enables individuals to withstand disruptions, confidently participate in decision-making, and maintain meaningful choices. Women don’t require another admonition about saving; they need financial plans honest enough to assess the real cost of time.

Dr. Francois Stofberg is a financial well-being economist at the Efficient Group.

Read:
The inclusion of women in financial planning
Smashing retirement’s glass ceiling: Expert tips for women
Financial advice for women starting out their careers
Financial planning for women: Protecting your finances against divorce